Outbreak!: Why Insurance Professionals Need to Beware of Monkeypox – Insurance Law and Business – United States

To publish this article, all you need is to register or log in to Mondaq.com.

Monkeypox was declared a global public health emergency by the US Department of Health and Human Services on August 4, 2022, only the fifth time this has happened since 2009. As of September 20, 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 24,203 confirmed cases. cases across the country, with California (4,753) and New York (3,799) leading the way. The immediate and long-term effects of Monkeypox on the commercial insurance industry are unclear for several reasons.

Some studies show that Monkeypox requires prolonged, close, eye-to-eye contact or direct skin-to-skin contact with infected lesions to spread. The risk of slowing the spread reduces the chance of a major government shutdown or stay-at-home order, and the official says property and income will be damaged, of the kind seen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Although property insurance should not be affected by the spread of Monkeypox, liability insurance may not be covered. For example, schools, daycare centers, nursing homes and other care facilities may face lawsuits related to Monkeypox exposure linked to allegedly inadequate preventive measures. As always, insurance industry professionals must be guided by a foreign language.

However, such claims must be covered by the coverage found in many problems, errors & omissions, or homeowner’s policies (or even auto policies). Especially, in Lambi v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 498 F. App’x 655 (8th Cir. 2013) (applying Missouri law), the Court considered the conduct of two consanguineous adults when one allegedly transmitted a sexually transmitted disease to the other. Insurance was denied coverage by the Homeowners Act because the definition of “bodily injury” did not include “any of the following that can be transmitted: disease, bacteria, virus, virus, or other organism transmitted by the insured to any other person . . . .” Id. at 656. The Eighth Circuit held that the statute did not include the actual or implied transmission of an infectious disease because transmission of HIV fell within the scope and general definition of the transmission of an infectious disease. Id.; see again Plaza v. gen. Guaranteed. co.244 AD2d 238, 239 (NY App. Div. 1997) (use of infectious disease to eliminate injury from HIV); Koegler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 623 F.Supp. 2d 481, 484-85 (SDNY 2009) (communicable disease exclusion would have prevented coverage for policyholders who transmitted HPV and herpes in the absence of a timely waiver, since exclusion was uncertain).

Places where workers come into contact with people affected by their work, such as hospitals, clinics, fitness centers, gyms, physical therapists, gyms, and fitness centers, may see an increase in claims. about other people. In addition, day care centers and schools, where children have close contact for a long time, may see claims that the student has contracted Monkeypox on the premises.

Currently, we are looking at the numbers of Monkeypox cases and analyzing the languages ​​that may be affected.

The content of this article is intended to provide guidance on this topic. Professional advice should be sought for your specific situation.

HELPFUL INFORMATION: Insurance from the United States

Insurance Law – Week of September 3, 2022

Morrison Mahoney LLP

And then there were five. Even conservatives hope that the Washington Supreme Court’s track record of finding difficult cases in difficult cases can help them reverse recent…